Connecticut Appellate Court· 1/22/2002
State v. Pierce
Citations
- 67 Conn. App. 634
- 789 A.2d 496
- 2002 Conn. App. LEXIS 38
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \The purpose of the exclusionary rule is to penalize law enforcement officials by suppressing evidence obtained by illegal means in order to deter police conduct that tramples on the fourth amendment rights of citizens.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dranginis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Fernando V.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-03-26· cited 38×
- State v. Van EckConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-04-30· cited 17×
- State v. VinesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-07-30· cited 14×
- State v. CzyzewskiConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-06-04· cited 5×
- State v. MosbackConnecticut Appellate Court· 2015-08-11
- State v. PierceSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-03-28
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Barker v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1986-04-28· cited 174×
- State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-01-07· cited 129×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1993-08-24· cited 120×
- Hoskins v. Titan Value Equities Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2000-05-04· cited 93×
- State v. ClarkSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-01-30· cited 89×
- State v. EadySupreme Court of Connecticut· 1999-07-06· cited 77×
- State v. OstroskiSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1986-12-09· cited 54×
- State v. ColvinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1997-07-15· cited 36×
- State v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1998-08-25· cited 36×
- State v. HammondSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2001-08-21· cited 33×
- State v. NievesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-08-21· cited 12×
- State v. WrightConnecticut Appellate Court· 2000-06-06· cited 10×
- State v. BuddhuConnecticut Appellate Court· 2001-08-14· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.