Supreme Court of Connecticut· 12/9/1986

State v. Ostroski

Citations

201 Conn. 534
518 A.2d 915
1986 Conn. LEXIS 1011

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the inmate “was not an agent of the police” and that, balancing all three Brown factors, the defendant’s confession to a fellow inmate “was not the product of police exploitation of any prior illegality but was a totally unexpected voluntary admission by the defendant”
purpose of continued detention was not “to acquire a totally unexpected, voluntary admission by the defendant to his friend Allen”
“[a] summary request such as this one does not comply with our rules of practice”
defendant’s “summary request” contained no facts at all

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Healey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.