Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 9/17/2012
State v. Phipps
Citations
- 820 N.W.2d 282
- 2012 WL 4052405
- 2012 Minn. App. LEXIS 104
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying the void-for-vagueness doctrine to an order for protection
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Connolly, Johnson, Larkin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
- State v. NewstromSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1985-07-19· cited 78×
- Dunham v. RoerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-01-10· cited 66×
- State v. BussmannSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-11-01· cited 37×
- Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2001-03-23· cited 36×
- Commonwealth v. ButlerMassachusetts Appeals Court· 1996-02-22· cited 24×
- State v. NessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2012-08-20· cited 14×
- State v. RomineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2008-12-09· cited 13×
- Pastos v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 2008-10-24· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.