· 7/19/1985
State v. Newstrom
Citations
- 371 N.W.2d 525
- 26 Educ. L. Rep. 1203
- 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1143
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that “essentially equivalent” is unconstitutionally vague
- declining to reach other issues in a case when one issue was dispositive
- courts can place limiting constructions on terms of a statute, provided limitation is consistent with legislative intent
- courts can place limiting constructions on terms of a statute, provided limitation is consistent with legislative intent
- statute requiring teachers to have qualifications “essentially equivalent” to those of public school teachers unconstitutionally vague because it provides “no guidance” to enforcement officials
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wahl
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.