Skip to main content
· 7/19/1985

State v. Newstrom

Citations

  • 371 N.W.2d 525
  • 26 Educ. L. Rep. 1203
  • 1985 Minn. LEXIS 1143

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “essentially equivalent” is unconstitutionally vague
  • declining to reach other issues in a case when one issue was dispositive
  • courts can place limiting constructions on terms of a statute, provided limitation is consistent with legislative intent
  • courts can place limiting constructions on terms of a statute, provided limitation is consistent with legislative intent
  • statute requiring teachers to have qualifications “essentially equivalent” to those of public school teachers unconstitutionally vague because it provides “no guidance” to enforcement officials

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wahl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.