Peters-Riemers v. Riemers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting discretionary factors for the appointment of counsel from Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335, 96 S.Ct. 893, 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976)
• adopting discretionary factors for the appointment of counsel from Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 (1976)
• district court did not lose jurisdiction upon filing of patently frivolous notice of appeal
• district court retains jurisdiction to enforce a judgment
• \[T]he argument that ... the defendant holds the keys to the jailhouse door does not apply to diminish the defendant's liberty interest. A defendant found in contempt and incarcerated does not hold the keys to the jailhouse door if the defendant cannot pay.\ (citations omitted)
• “[T]he argument that ... the defendant holds the keys to the jailhouse door does not apply to diminish the defendant’s liberty interest. A defendant found in contempt and incarcerated does not hold the keys to the jailhouse door if the defendant cannot pay.” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).