State v. Phipps
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 1188
Syllabus
The record does not reflect ineffective assistance of counsel based on defense counsel's trial strategy. Appellant's convictions for violating a protection order are valid notwithstanding the fact that the protection order was issued on an outdated form. The trial court did not err in denying appellant's request to discharge his attorney during trial. The trial court was not required to inquire into the reason for appellant's dissatisfaction where his complaint was not sufficiently specific. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. AllenOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-10-06· cited 7×
- State v. PowellOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-10-11· cited 5×
- State v. ElliottOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-09-03· cited 4×
- State v. HeppOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-04· cited 1×
- State v. CunninghamOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-08-15· cited 1×
- State v. DabbeltOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-09
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. HaleOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-15· cited 402×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2006-12-13· cited 291×
- State v. DealOhio Supreme Court· 1969-02-11· cited 166×
- State v. YBarraOhio Court of Appeals· 2016-09-01· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.