Ohio Court of Appeals· 8/15/2025

State v. Cunningham

Citations

2025 Ohio 2894

Syllabus

The trial court did not abuse its discretion when it overruled appellant's request for new appointed counsel on the day of trial. Appellant's guilty plea was knowing, intelligent, and voluntary. The trial court did not err by imposing a maximum prison sentence. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Tucker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Hanson
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2026-01-09· cited 1×

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Boykin v. Alabama
Supreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
State v. Adams
Ohio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
State v. Wilson
Ohio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 355×
State v. McNeill
Ohio Supreme Court· 1998-10-28· cited 226×
State v. King
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-17· cited 175×
State v. Leopard
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-08-05· cited 135×
State v. Brown
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-11-03· cited 113×
State v. Brown
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-01-20· cited 69×
State v. Huffman
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2017-06-02· cited 44×
State v. Cole
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-18· cited 32×
State v. Trent
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-15· cited 18×
State v. Burrell
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2014-03-31· cited 9×
State v. Coleman
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-23· cited 6×
State v. Phipps
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-04-08· cited 6×
State v. Hepp
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-04· cited 1×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.