State v. Philpotts
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1810
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) application for reopening, sufficiency of the evidence, aggravated murder, felony murder, complicity. The appellant's App.R. 26(B) application for reopening is denied because appellate counsel was not ineffective on appeal. This court, on direct appeal, found that sufficient evidence was adduced at trial to support the conviction for aggravated murder and felony murder. The appellant has failed to establish that he was prejudiced by appellate counsel on appeal. Application for reopening is denied.
Judges: Forbes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court· 2000-01-19· cited 3,510×
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1956-01-23· cited 2,788×
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-12-05· cited 1,308×
- State v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court· 2001-09-26· cited 585×
- Bradley v. OhioSupreme Court· 1990-06-25· cited 133×
- State v. MayOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-28· cited 18×
- State v. LesterOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-19· cited 6×
- State v. PhilpottsOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-08-18· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.