Supreme Court of Iowa· 3/22/2000

State v. Phillips

Citations

610 N.W.2d 840
2000 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 59
2000 WL 339571

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding statutorily mandated minimum sentences did not infringe on executive branch’s power
rejecting the defendant’s argument that the parole and work-release restrictions of section 902.12 infringe on the separation of powers between branches of government
“Because we have rejected all of Phillips’ arguments on their merits, we need not address the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel she has raised to excuse her trial counsel’s failure to preserve error in the district court.”
“Because we have rejected all of Phillips’ arguments on their merits, we need not address the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel she has raised to excuse her trial counsel’s failure to preserve error in the district court.”
“Because we have rejected all of Phillips’ arguments on their merits, we need not address the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel she has raised to excuse her trial counsel’s failure to preserve error in the district court.”
analyzing whether section 902.12 was unconstitutional on various grounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larson, Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.