Court of Appeals of Oregon· 5/12/2021
State v. Phillips
Citations
- 311 Or. App. 309
- 489 P.3d 1106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining the importance of a “substan- tial logical link” between the prior acts and charged crime when determining whether the prior acts could be relevant for the nonpropensity purpose of motive
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: DeVore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. TurnidgeOregon Supreme Court· 2016-05-05· cited 129×
- State v. LotchesOregon Supreme Court· 2000-12-29· cited 125×
- State v. HamptonOregon Supreme Court· 1993-07-29· cited 94×
- State v. BaughmanOregon Supreme Court· 2017-04-27· cited 91×
- State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court· 1990-01-11· cited 78×
- State v. SkillicornOregon Supreme Court· 2021-01-14· cited 67×
- State v. DilalloOregon Supreme Court· 2020-12-24· cited 66×
- State v. TenaOregon Supreme Court· 2018-03-01· cited 20×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-14· cited 18×
- State v. SavageCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-07-08· cited 14×
- State v. LevasseurCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-03-10· cited 14×
- State v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-12-29· cited 13×
- State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-05-24· cited 9×
- State v. HagnerCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-04-12· cited 8×
- State v. BlanscetCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2009-08-19· cited 5×
- State v. BartleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-06-23· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.