State v. Peterson
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 2766
Syllabus
App.R. 26(B) application for reopening res judicata preliminary hearing valid indictment jurisdiction of court of common pleas over felony case. The appellant's App.R. 26(B) application for reopening is denied because appellate counsel was not ineffective on appeal. The appellant has failed to raise proposed assignments of error in support of his application for reopening. However, the appellant has presented sufficient arguments to discern proposed issues in support of the claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. A review of the issues raised in support of the application for reopening, as premised upon a defective preliminary hearing and lack of jurisdiction on the part of the trial court, fails to establish that the appellant was prejudiced by appellate counsel on appeal.
Judges: E.A. Gallagher
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. PerryOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-03· cited 2,571×
- State v. MurnahanOhio Supreme Court· 1992-02-19· cited 753×
- Bradley v. OhioSupreme Court· 1990-06-25· cited 133×
- State v. MayOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-28· cited 18×
- State v. LesterOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-19· cited 6×
- State v. PetersonOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-17· cited 6×
- State v. RogersOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-03-23· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.