Skip to main content

State v. Peterson

Citations

  • 836 A.2d 821
  • 364 N.J. Super. 387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the strength of the State's proofs is not a relevant factor for consideration where the perpetrator's identity was at issue
  • holding that the DNA retesting statute \sets forth eight conditions a 19 A-2006-14T1 convicted person must establish to be entitled to such testing[.]\
  • emphasizing that a court may not deny a motion for DNA testing because the court finds it unlikely that DNA testing would produce favorable results; instead the court has to consider the evidential significance of whatever \favorable\ DNA test results could be obtained
  • “[T]he strength of the evidence against a defendant is not a relevant factor in determining whether his identity as the perpetrator was a significant issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judges Skillman, Coburn and Wells

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.