Skip to main content

Anderson v. State

Citations

  • 831 A.2d 858
  • 2003 Del. LEXIS 441
  • 2003 WL 22069763

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • motion for forensic testing should be granted when requested testing presents even “ ‘slight’ ” possibility of favorable result
  • “Identity is always an issue in a criminal trial unless the defendant admits having engaged in the alleged conduct and relies on a defense such as consent or justification.”
  • construing similar requirement of Delaware postconviction DNA testing statute

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Veasey, Holland, Berger, Steele, Jacobs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.