State v. Peterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying motion to suppress expert testi mony regarding analysis of substance consumed in testing where defendant had opportunity to cross-examine on foundation matters
• LMG evidence properly admitted where visible dark stains indicated presence of blood and confirmatory tests established that substance was blood
• LMG evidence properly admitted where visible dark stains indicated presence of blood and confirmatory tests established that substance was blood

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Henry
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 2016-02-26· cited 333×
• State v. Thompson
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-10-22· cited 91×
• In Re Estate of Schindler
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1998-07-07· cited 9×
• People v. Wheeler
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-09-27· cited 6×
• State v. Stubblefield
  Nebraska Court of Appeals· 1993-12-07· cited 4×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Arizona v. Youngblood
  Supreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
• State v. Jacob
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1993-01-08· cited 100×
• State v. Trevino
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1988-12-02· cited 91×
• State v. Benzel
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1985-07-12· cited 74×
• State v. Timmerman
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1992-02-28· cited 40×
• State v. Gibbs
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-06-07· cited 39×
• State v. Andersen
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1991-05-03· cited 35×
• State v. Batchelor
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1974-01-18· cited 10×
• State v. Tanner
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1989-12-01· cited 8×
• State v. Brodrick
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1973-03-30· cited 6×