Nebraska Supreme Court· 10/22/1993

State v. Thompson

Citations

507 N.W.2d 253
244 Neb. 375
1993 Neb. LEXIS 246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that motion for new trial not filed in conformity with statutory requirements as to time may not be considered on appeal
holding that motion for new trial not filed in conformity with statutory requirements as to time may not be considered on appeal
finding that “[ajlthough the statute does not expressly state that the ‘other crimes, wrongs, or acts’ must be those of the accused and not of a third party, it is obviously implied, and we have previously held that to be the case”
applying § 25-2221 in determining whether motion for new trial was timely filed
evidence of prior abuse by a third party was properly excluded as irrelevant to defendant’s claim of self-defense
evidence of prior abuse by a third party was properly excluded as irrelevant to defendant's claim of self-defense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hastings, Boslaugh, White, Shanahan, Fahrnbruch, Lanphier, Ronin, Caporale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.