Court of Appeals of North Carolina· 9/15/2015
State v. Perry
Citations
- 776 S.E.2d 528
- 243 N.C. App. 156
- 2015 N.C. App. LEXIS 769
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the state constitution provision provides the same protections against unreasonable search and seizure as the Fourth Amendment, and expressly recognizing the third-party doctrine discussed in Miller and Smith
- calling location information “historical” when “evidence show[ed] AT & T emailed the delayed recorded information to [law enforcement] every fifteen minutes”
- calling location information “historical” when “evidence show[ed] AT&T emailed the delayed recorded information to [law enforcement] every fifteen minutes”
- “A court order compelling disclosure pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) [(2018
- “A court order compelling disclosure pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2703(d) [(2018
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Tyson, McGee
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ford, Jon ThomasCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-12-16· cited 44×
- State v. Gary Lunsford (075691)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2016-08-01· cited 16×
- Hankston, Gareic JerardCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2017-04-12· cited 14×
- State v. LaddCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2016-03-15· cited 10×
- State v. GoreCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2020-06-16
- State v. LaneCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2021-11-02
- State v. ValentineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2017-04-04
- State v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2022-12-29
- State v. AllenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina· 2025-12-03
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court· 1984-09-18· cited 9,230×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court· 1987-02-24· cited 2,521×
- Smith v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 2,305×
- Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2001-06-11· cited 1,834×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2011-06-16· cited 1,497×
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court· 2012-01-23· cited 1,330×
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court· 1976-04-21· cited 1,197×
- United States v. KnottsSupreme Court· 1983-03-02· cited 749×
- Doe v. BroderickFourth Circuit· 2000-08-29· cited 179×
- In re the United StatesFifth Circuit· 2013-07-30· cited 155×
- United States v. Quartavious DavisEleventh Circuit· 2015-05-05· cited 133×
- State v. EarlsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2013-07-18· cited 96×
- United States v. Melvin SkinnerSixth Circuit· 2012-08-14· cited 88×
- In Re Application for Pen Register & Trap/Trace Device With Cell Site Location AuthorityS.D. Texas· 2005-10-14· cited 77×
- United States v. Henry StephensFourth Circuit· 2014-08-19· cited 56×
- In Re the United States for an Order Authorizing the Use of a Pen Register & a Trap & Trace DeviceE.D. New York· 2005-10-24· cited 54×
- Shawn Alvin Tracey v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2014-10-16· cited 53×
- United States v. Aaron GrahamFourth Circuit· 2015-08-05· cited 47×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.