State v. Perry
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 1486
Syllabus
The trial court erred in transposing offenses when imposing appellant's sentence for two convictions. Appellant's convictions on five counts of disseminating matter harmful to juveniles was time barred by the applicable statute of limitations. As for other charges, appellant's attorney did not provide ineffective assistance by failing to raise a statute-of-limitations argument. The record also does not portray ineffective assistance of counsel for failing to object to the jury's verdict being read in appellant's absence, and the trial court's taking of the verdict was not plain error. Appellant's convictions on two undifferentiated counts of gross sexual imposition did not violate due process. Judgment affirmed in part, reversed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for resentencing.
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. BradleyOhio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1983-08-24· cited 530×
- Michael E. Valentine v. Khelleh Konteh, WardenSixth Circuit· 2005-01-24· cited 185×
- State v. HensleyOhio Supreme Court· 1991-05-01· cited 86×
- State v. BillmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-12-16· cited 34×
- State v. HaynesOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-15· cited 28×
- State v. SchwarzmanOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-06-05· cited 15×
- State v. ArtzOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-12-18· cited 10×
- State v. HlavsaOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-07-07· cited 4×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-12-27· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.