State v. Perez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the statute \creat[es] [an] exception to some criminal-sexual-conduct offenses if [the] complainant is [the] actor's legal spouse and [the] couple is not in [the] process of separation or divorce\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rakas v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1979-01-15· cited 6,103×
• State v. Murphy
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-04-12· cited 128×
• In Re the Welfare of B.R.K.
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-04-03· cited 59×
• State v. Koenig
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2003-07-31· cited 55×
• Jillian Kempf v. Karl Gene Kempf
  Eighth Circuit· 1989-02-21· cited 44×
• State v. Bryant
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-05-22· cited 43×
• Annandale Advocate v. City of Annandale
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1989-01-20· cited 42×
• State v. Jordan
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2007-12-06· cited 33×
• Clayton v. Richards
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2001-05-09· cited 26×
• State v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2008-08-07· cited 20×
• In Re the Marriage of Tigges
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2008-12-19· cited 10×
• State v. Favors
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1992-02-11· cited 4×
• State v. Ulmer
  Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2006-08-08· cited 2×