State v. Perez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding reversible error under Utah Rule of Evidence 608, based on the State’s bolstering of its witness prior to any attack of the witness’s credibility
• declining to adopt an “anticipatory rebuttal“ rule because the express language of Rule 608 “clearly provides that a witness’s credibility may not be bolstered before it is attacked[.]“

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

• State v. Moore
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2002-08-15· cited 4×

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Dunn
  Utah Supreme Court· 1993-03-18· cited 447×
• United States v. Charles Townsend
  Sixth Circuit· 1986-07-11· cited 87×
• United States v. Henry Taylor
  Fourth Circuit· 1990-04-10· cited 28×
• United States v. Nicholas D. Lord Anthony Tiano
  Tenth Circuit· 1990-07-11· cited 28×
• State v. Vigil
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1996-07-05· cited 23×
• State v. Williams
  Utah Supreme Court· 1982-11-09· cited 22×
• State v. Hovater
  Utah Supreme Court· 1996-03-20· cited 18×