State v. Perdue
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 8762
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in overruling Appellant's motion to suppress the contraband discovered inside his vehicle. The warrantless search of Appellant's vehicle was lawful under the automobile exception to the warrant requirement because two of the officers at the scene smelled the odor of marijuana emanating from the vehicle, which provided probable cause to conduct a warrantless search, and at least one of the officers testified regarding his training and experience in detecting the odor of marijuana. Affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court· 1970-10-12· cited 4,391×
- State v. MillsOhio Supreme Court· 1992-01-08· cited 1,624×
- California v. CarneySupreme Court· 1985-05-13· cited 1,276×
- Pennsylvania v. LabronSupreme Court· 1996-07-01· cited 668×
- State v. ChildsOhio Supreme Court· 1968-04-17· cited 404×
- State v. MooreOhio Supreme Court· 2000-09-20· cited 370×
- State v. WelchOhio Supreme Court· 1985-07-03· cited 84×
- State v. DavenportOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-24· cited 24×
- State v. PraterOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-02· cited 23×
- State v. ShippOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-28· cited 14×
- State v. ChaseOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-07· cited 10×
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-09-26· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.