Skip to main content

State v. Grant

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 2601

Syllabus

The trial court did not commit any error under Crim.R. 12(F) when ruling on appellant's motion to suppress, and appellant waived any alleged error in that regard by failing to request that the trial court state its essential factual findings on the record. In addition, the trial court correctly denied appellant's motion to suppress because the warrantless search of appellant's vehicle was justified given that the police officer smelled the odors of raw and burnt marijuana coming from the interior of the vehicle. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.