Connecticut Appellate Court· 8/26/2003
State v. Pepper
Citations
- 79 Conn. App. 1
- 828 A.2d 1268
- 2003 Conn. App. LEXIS 374
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[o]ur conclusion that any misconduct was not severe is highlighted by the fact that no objection or curative instructions were sought by the defendant at trial”
- any potential Doyle violation harmless when prosecution’s evidence included physical evidence tying defendant to victim, defendant’s untruthful statement to police and victim’s physical injuries
- any alleged Doyle violation was harmless beyond reasonable doubt because there was substantial evidence supporting defendant’s guilt, including physical evidence tying defendant to victim, alleged Doyle violation was isolated, and there were no repeated references to defendant’s silence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: McLachlan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
10 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2006-12-26· cited 67×
- State v. JenkinsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-03-23· cited 23×
- State v. SpiegelmannConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-02-10· cited 20×
- State v. BereisConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-09-29· cited 19×
- State v. SellsConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-04-06· cited 16×
- State v. PepperSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2004-12-07· cited 8×
- State v. FrancisConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-06-01· cited 5×
- State v. AlexisConnecticut Appellate Court· 2019-11-05· cited 3×
- State v. PepperSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-10-07· cited 1×
- State v. William A.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2025-09-02
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 4,773×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-06-03· cited 248×
- State v. SinghSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2002-03-26· cited 212×
- State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1992-08-04· cited 74×
- State v. SandovalSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-05-13· cited 56×
- State v. D'AmbrosioSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-07-04· cited 53×
- State v. HenryConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-10-01· cited 31×
- State v. Francis D.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2003-02-11· cited 29×
- State v. CrosbyConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-05-03· cited 28×
- State v. MoodyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-06-03· cited 21×
- State v. MoodySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2003-07-02· cited 20×
- State v. CruzConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-07-23· cited 18×
- State v. WebbConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-03-11· cited 18×
- State v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-05-14· cited 17×
- State v. SmithConnecticut Appellate Court· 1996-07-02· cited 14×
- State v. DuboseConnecticut Appellate Court· 2003-02-18· cited 13×
- State v. PulaskiConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-08-13· cited 12×
- State v. KurankoConnecticut Appellate Court· 2002-08-20· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.