State v. Pendleton
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 3199
Syllabus
Defendant-appellant's indictment for aggravated trafficking in a Schedule II drug as a second degree felony and aggravated possession of a Schedule II drug as a second degree felony, with neither indictment generating an objection before trial, validly charged Defendant-appellant with trafficking in a Schedule II controlled substance and possession of a Schedule II controlled substance based upon the fentanyl contained within the mixtures of controlled substances found at Defendant-appellant's home. The State presented sufficient evidence of the amount of fentanyl involved to support Defendant-appellant's convictions for aggravated trafficking in a Schedule II drug as a second degree felony and aggravated possession of a Schedule II drug as a second degree felony. The trial court correctly concluded that the heroin trafficking and the heroin possession counts and the aggravated trafficking (fentanyl) and the aggravated possession (fentanyl) counts did not merge into one offense as allied offenses of similar import. Defendant-appellant's convictions are not against the manifest weight of the evidence. The trial court's jury instructions did not include an instruction regarding excluded fingerprint evidence nor a formal bulk amount instruction. Neither omission generated an objection, and, on this record, we cannot conclude that the trial's outcome would have been different if the instructions had been given. Based upon the same reasoning, we cannot conclude that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance of counsel by not objecting to the omission of these instructions. Finally, the trial court, as to the offense of having a weapon under disability, erroneously concluded that the State had the burden to prove that the Defendant had not been relieved from disability. Relief from a weapon possession disability is an affirmative defense with the defendant having the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence however, double jeopardy prohibits a retrial of thi
Judges: Tucker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. Pendleton (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-23· cited 28×
- State v. PayneOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-10-10· cited 12×
- State v. GibsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-03-22· cited 9×
- State v. MorganOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-07-02· cited 9×
- State v. DanielsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-16· cited 3×
- State v. StevensOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-06· cited 3×
- State v. TopeOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-13· cited 2×
- State v. FolkOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-09-08· cited 2×
- State v. ShakhmanovOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-15· cited 1×
- State v. StrodesOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-01
- State v. WrightOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-11-22
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. JenksOhio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court· 1969-06-23· cited 7,763×
- Michel v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1956-01-23· cited 2,788×
- State v. SmithOhio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
- Alabama v. SmithSupreme Court· 1989-06-12· cited 1,589×
- Affronti v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1955-12-05· cited 1,308×
- State v. RuffOhio Supreme Court· 2015-03-25· cited 912×
- State v. UnderwoodOhio Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 724×
- State v. RogersOhio Supreme Court· 2015-06-24· cited 703×
- State v. HankersonOhio Supreme Court· 1982-05-19· cited 556×
- State v. WoleryOhio Supreme Court· 1976-06-02· cited 520×
- State v. WhitfieldOhio Supreme Court· 2010-01-05· cited 453×
- State v. BrownOhio Supreme Court· 2008-09-17· cited 413×
- State v. WaddellOhio Supreme Court· 1996-03-04· cited 330×
- State v. SkatzesOhio Supreme Court· 2004-12-08· cited 294×
- State v. AllenOhio Supreme Court· 1987-04-01· cited 232×
- State v. BrookeOhio Supreme Court· 2007-04-18· cited 175×
- State v. Earley (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-11-10· cited 146×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.