State v. Massey
Citations
- 2024 ND 118
Syllabus
When a defendant is charged with gross sexual imposition under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-2003(1)(a) requiring the State prove a defendant touched various parts of the victim's body in a manner constituting a sexual act does not specify a culpability level, the jury is then required to find the actions were willful. Even if the State makes a \golden rule\ argument when the issue has not been preserved for appeal, the defendant still must demonstrate the comments had a prejudicial effect to require reversal under obvious error.
Judges: Jensen, Jon J.
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. OlanderNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1998-03-05· cited 137×
- State v. EvansNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1999-04-27· cited 35×
- State v. ClarkNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-04-19· cited 32×
- State v. PembertonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2019-06-27· cited 30×
- United States v. John PalmaEighth Circuit· 2007-01-18· cited 28×
- State v. PattersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2014-10-28· cited 28×
- Pemberton v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2021-05-20· cited 14×
- State v. LandrusNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-05-26· cited 9×
- State v. LymanNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 2022-08-18· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.