Skip to main content

State v. Pelletier

Citations

  • 149 N.H. 243
  • 818 A.2d 292
  • 2003 N.H. LEXIS 34

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the trial court’s determination that a physician’s expert testimony was reliable given the physician’s extensive background “providing child abuse evaluations for detecting and investigating child sexual abuse in hundreds of cases”
  • relying upon trial testimony to affirm ruling that expert was qualified
  • only acts that are “attributable to the husband-wife relation” are subject to the evidentiary privilege (quotation omitted)
  • doctor's lack of specialization in a particular field did not disqualify her from offering an expert opinion under Rule 702 based on her general education, training, and experience
  • interpreting N.H. R. Evid. 504

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brock, Broderick, Dalianis, Duggan, Nadeau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

17 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.