State v. Peeples

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 677

Syllabus

Appellant's guilty pleas were not less than knowing, voluntary, and intelligent solely because the trial court sentenced him to a lengthier prison term than the parties' joint recommendation. Appellant had been informed orally and in writing that the trial court was not required to follow the joint recommendation. Appellant failed to show he was prejudiced by the trial court's alleged error in ordering part of his sentence to run concurrently to a previous sentence. The trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying appellant's motion to withdraw his guilty pleas. Judgment affirmed.