State v. Peeples

Citations

• 2024 Ohio 993

Syllabus

Trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant's motion to continue sentencing hearing, where it had granted an earlier request and where the purpose of defendant's motion was occasioned by a collateral criminal proceeding in another county. Trial court was under no duty to postpone sentencing hearing indefinitely, especially where the defendant bore the responsibility for the circumstances giving rise to the need for the request.