Ohio Court of Appeals· 1/2/2026
State v. Latham
Citations
- 2026 Ohio 6
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in failing to impose the sentence the parties jointly recommended in their plea agreement. The court informed appellant that it was not bound by the agreement and informed appellant of the possible range of sentences he could receive. In addition, the sentence is not contrary to law. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hanseman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. WilsonOhio Supreme Court· 2011-06-08· cited 355×
- United States v. John Christopher DoyleSecond Circuit· 1965-10-11· cited 288×
- State v. KingOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-05-17· cited 175×
- State v. BurtonOhio Supreme Court· 1977-10-19· cited 61×
- State v. WorthenOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-08-13· cited 45×
- State v. NeffOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-12-21· cited 15×
- State v. DowningOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-08-07· cited 10×
- State v. CoffeeOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-02-17· cited 8×
- State v. GibsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-02-24· cited 7×
- State v. PeoplesOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-03-24· cited 7×
- State v. MelsonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-04-14· cited 5×
- State v. HamptonOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-05-12· cited 5×
- State v. PeeplesOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-02-28· cited 1×
- State v. KiddOhio Court of Appeals· 2025-09-05· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.