Supreme Court of Connecticut· 8/19/2003
State v. Peeler
Citations
- 265 Conn. 460
- 828 A.2d 1216
- 2003 Conn. LEXIS 316
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing that \a primary purpose of the sixth amendment is to grant a criminal defendant effective control over the conduct of his defense\
- ruling on Russell Peeler's appeal of the Snead murder conviction and related charges
- right to counsel of choice “stem[s] largely from an appreciation that a primary purpose of the sixth amendment is to grant a criminal defendant effective control over the conduct of his defense”
- improper denial of defendant’s constitutional right to counsel of choice during trial not subject to harmless error review because it constituted fundamental component of sixth amendment right to fair trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Katz, Zarella
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. EbronSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2009-07-28· cited 49×
- Alexis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2014-03-24· cited 43×
- State v. SamConnecticut Appellate Court· 2006-10-10· cited 24×
- State v. CrockerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2004-07-06· cited 20×
- State v. StuartConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-04-07· cited 18×
- State v. LeeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-10-09· cited 15×
- State v. TurnerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-02-28· cited 11×
- State v. GoldsberryCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2011-04-26· cited 10×
- Gatlin v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2007-06-07· cited 9×
- State v. FaySupreme Court of Connecticut· 2017-09-12· cited 9×
- State v. LaFountainConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-04-12· cited 7×
- State v. RodriguezConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-02-21· cited 6×
- State v. JohnsonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-01-29· cited 4×
- Newland v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2019-04-30· cited 3×
- State v. MartinezConnecticut Appellate Court· 2009-06-30· cited 2×
- State v. BrownConnecticut Appellate Court· 2005-10-11· cited 1×
- Connecticut v. PeelerSupreme Court· 2004-05-03
- State v. RodriguezSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2014-01-28
- State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2015-07-07
- State v. TilusConnecticut Appellate Court· 2015-05-26
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1999-06-10· cited 5,157×
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1932-11-07· cited 4,979×
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1988-06-30· cited 1,962×
- Flanagan v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1984-02-21· cited 989×
- Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1989-06-22· cited 804×
- United States v. John VoigtThird Circuit· 1996-07-09· cited 454×
- United States v. Kayle NordbyNinth Circuit· 2000-09-11· cited 377×
- State v. WebbSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-07-30· cited 214×
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-27· cited 203×
- State v. KurvinSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1982-03-30· cited 191×
- Joseph Michael Serra v. Michigan Department of Corrections, Raymond G. ToombsSixth Circuit· 1993-10-29· cited 189×
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Canaan Oil Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1987-02-03· cited 182×
- Roy Wilson v. Barry MintzesSixth Circuit· 1985-06-17· cited 181×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1984-04-24· cited 160×
- United States v. Ralph H. WashingtonNinth Circuit· 1986-08-20· cited 145×
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1980-05-06· cited 114×
- Ullmann v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1994-08-09· cited 107×
- United States v. RegisterEleventh Circuit· 1999-07-29· cited 104×
- State v. JenningsSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-12-11· cited 100×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.