Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2/28/2011
State v. Abdi
Citations
- 248 P.3d 209
- 226 Ariz. 361
- 602 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 4
- 2011 Ariz. App. LEXIS 22
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding no violation in part because the record contained no evidence supporting the defendant’s theory that a witness was motivated to lie
- finding the trial court’s exclusion of evidence on cross-examination to be permissible when the evidence involved a collateral issue, might have confused the jury, and would have been cumulative
- no error in limiting cross-examination going to bias where “the jury was already aware of a strong potential motivation for the [witness] to be untruthful, and the [excluded] evidence would have been cumulative at best.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Eckerstrom, Garye, Kelly, Peter, Vasquez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Arizona v. Allyn Akeem SmithArizona Supreme Court· 2020-11-04· cited 21×
- Whitt v. MezaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-02-27· cited 1×
- State of Arizona v. Jordan Christopher EwerArizona Supreme Court· 2023-01-18
- State v. Sulu-KerrCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2024-01-25
- Rodriguez-Ramirez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2025-04-29
- State of Arizona v. Max G. MorenoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2026-02-20
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 7,102×
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court· 1979-06-18· cited 3,585×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Crane v. KentuckySupreme Court· 1986-06-09· cited 2,651×
- Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court· 1985-04-29· cited 2,053×
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court· 1979-06-04· cited 1,990×
- United States v. NoblesSupreme Court· 1975-06-23· cited 1,718×
- United States v. SchefferSupreme Court· 1998-03-31· cited 1,617×
- Holmes v. South CarolinaSupreme Court· 2006-05-01· cited 1,409×
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court· 2005-07-08· cited 1,009×
- State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court· 1983-01-11· cited 423×
- State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court· 1990-12-14· cited 276×
- State v. AndersonArizona Supreme Court· 2005-05-04· cited 191×
- State v. DannArizona Supreme Court· 2003-08-14· cited 167×
- State v. GallegosArizona Supreme Court· 1994-03-15· cited 158×
- Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-07-24· cited 158×
- State v. ZuckArizona Supreme Court· 1982-11-15· cited 115×
- State v. DickensArizona Supreme Court· 1996-10-31· cited 112×
- State v. BracyArizona Supreme Court· 1985-06-10· cited 96×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.