Skip to main content

State v. Pearson

Citations

  • 514 N.W.2d 452
  • 1994 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 69
  • 1994 WL 98423

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding “skin-to-skin contact is not required in order to establish a ‘sex act’ under section 712.17” and determining “prohibited contact occurs when (1) the specified body parts or substitutes touch and (2
  • noting we need not resort to the rules of statutory construction “where legislative intent is evident through a reasonable construction of the statute”
  • examining “whether the contact was made to arouse or satisfy the sexual desires of the defendant”
  • stating “prohibited contact occurs when . . . the specified parts or substitutes touch”
  • considering “whether anyone else was present” and “the purposefulness of the contact”
  • finding “[w]hether certain conduct constitutes ‘sexual contact’ is a fact question”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ternus, Carter, Snell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.