State v. Phipps

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We hold that a lack of skin-to-skin contact alone does not, as a matter of law, put defendant’s conduct outside the definition of “sex act” as found in Iowa Code section 702.17 (1987).”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Pearson
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1994-03-23· cited 55×
• State of Iowa v. Robert Anthony Howard
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2012-12-21· cited 38×
• State of Iowa v. Aquiles Gonzalez Alvarado
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2016-02-26· cited 18×
• State of Iowa v. Aquiles Gonzalez Alvarado
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2015-08-05
• In the Interest of C.W., Minor Child, C.W.
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2017-11-08
• Amended May 3, 2016 State of Iowa v. Aquiles Gonzalez Alvarado
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 2016-02-26
• In re J.S.
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 2017-12-20

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Bass
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1984-05-16· cited 90×
• Resnick v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1978-12-20· cited 77×
• State v. LeGear
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1984-03-14· cited 68×
• State v. Samson
  Supreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1978-04-04· cited 35×
• State v. Whetstine
  Supreme Court of Iowa· 1982-02-17· cited 28×
• State v. Mueller
  Court of Appeals of Iowa· 1983-11-30· cited 19×
• State v. Schnaidt
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1987-07-22· cited 19×
• State v. Reich
  Nebraska Supreme Court· 1971-01-22· cited 7×