Skip to main content
· 8/8/2011

International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. Haley

Citations

  • 832 F. Supp. 2d 612
  • 2011 WL 3586109
  • 191 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2252
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93869

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that an issuer’s officers and directors were motivated in part by their financial interests “by virtue of their continued positions and salaries” where the at-issue company’s survival was “at stake”
  • “Plaintiffs are not required to additionally plead red flags or facts negating the Underwriters’ [reasonable reliance] defense.”
  • whether statement is one of opinion cannot \turn[ ] on th[e] semantic choice\ of the maker
  • whether statement is one of opinion cannot “turn[ ] on th[e] semantic choice” of the maker
  • allegation that offering was “critical to [the company’s] very survival” was “too generalized a motive to plead securities fraud”
  • “[I]t cannot be inferred [from the Consolidated Complaint] that the applicability of Section 956 was so obvious that the defendants] must have been aware of it .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Houck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.