Ohio Court of Appeals· 5/1/2017

State v. Peacock

Citations

2017 Ohio 2592

Syllabus

Defendant's tampering-with-evidence and resisting-arrest convictions were supported by sufficient evidence, and his possession-of-heroin conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Defendant did not receive ineffective assistance of counsel at trial.

Judges: Preston

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

State v. Lee
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-07-26· cited 22×
State v. Parsons
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-14
State v. Groh
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-04-28
State v. Buckius
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2025-05-20

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Strickland v. Washington
Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
State v. Thompkins
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
State v. Jenks
Ohio Supreme Court· 1991-07-31· cited 11,342×
State v. Dehass
Ohio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
State v. Bradley
Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-05-10· cited 7,124×
State v. Smith
Ohio Supreme Court· 1997-10-15· cited 2,042×
State v. Hunter
Ohio Supreme Court· 2011-12-20· cited 787×
State v. Haller
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-13· cited 264×
State v. Kole
Ohio Supreme Court· 2001-07-18· cited 263×
State v. Jones
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-10-30· cited 214×
State v. Berry
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2013-06-10· cited 147×
State v. Straley (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-05-29· cited 146×
State v. Williams
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-12-09· cited 136×
State v. Anaya
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2010-12-10· cited 10×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.