State v. Groh

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 1497

Syllabus

Gross Sexual Imposition; R.C. 2907.05(A)(4); Indictment; Consecutive Sentences; R.C. 2929.14(C)(4)(c). Defendant-appellant's convictions for gross sexual imposition were supported by sufficient evidence, were not against the manifest weight of the evidence, and did not violate the Due Process Clause. The trial court's decision to run the sentences for each conviction consecutively was not contrary to law.