State v. Payne
Citations
- 6 Wash. 563
- 34 P. 317
- 1893 Wash. LEXIS 338
Syllabus
<p>APPEAL — SETTLEMENT OP BILL OP EXCEPTIONS — JURIES — MANNER OP SELECTION — EVIDENCE — PROOF OF FORMER CONVICTION — CREDIBILITY OF WITNESS — LARCENY — SUFFICIENCY OF EVIDENCE — ADMISSIONS.</p> <p>Where an appellant has filed his bill of exceptions with the judge and served the respondent with a copy within the prescribed time, to which the respondent has filed objections and suggested certain amendments, the fact that the judge does not settle and sign the bill at the designated time, but subsequently, after á considerable length of absence from the state, settles and signs the bill of exceptions without notice to the respondent, but embodying the amendments proposed by the latter, is not sufficient ground for striking the bill from the transcript.</p> <p>Under §§59, 61, Code Proc., prescribing the method of drawing a jury from the jury list certified by the county commissioners, a deputy sheriff is not authorized to act in place of the sheriff.</p> <p>The fact that a sheriff does not make a return of his doings in summoning a special venire of jurors until after the commencement of the trial, is not ground for a challenge.</p> <p>The certificate of the officers to a jury list drawn by them should state how the drawing was actually done, and not simply that it was conducted fairly and as provided by law.</p> <p>Proof that a defendant in a criminal prosecution has formerly been confined in the county jail is irrelevant.</p> <p>The only competent evidence of the former conviction of defendant in a criminal prosecution is the production of a judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction founded upon an indictment or other proper accusation.</p> <p>The former conviction of a witness for the commission of a misdemeanor cannot be proved for the purpose of affecting his credibility.</p> <p>An admission by defendant that he knew a certain larceny had been committed, was not evidence that he actually participated in the commission of the crime, and he could not be convicte
Judges: Anders, Hoyt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RayWashington Supreme Court· 1991-03-21· cited 172×
- State v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court· 1968-08-29· cited 72×
- State v. MelvernWashington Supreme Court· 1903-05-05· cited 51×
- State v. BurtonWashington Supreme Court· 1984-02-02· cited 49×
- State v. CushingWashington Supreme Court· 1897-09-10· cited 38×
- State Of Washington v. Robert Lee TylerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-08-15· cited 31×
- State v. StoneWashington Supreme Court· 1912-01-16· cited 31×
- State v. PienickWashington Supreme Court· 1907-06-29· cited 30×
- State v. ChampouxWashington Supreme Court· 1903-12-05· cited 28×
- State Of Washington v. Michael R. StewartCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2020-02-10· cited 27×
- Bennett v. Supreme Tent of the Knights of the Maccabees of the WorldWashington Supreme Court· 1905-10-31· cited 26×
- State v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court· 1903-07-15· cited 23×
- State v. Western Union Telegraph Co.New Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1951-04-02· cited 22×
- State v. RipleyWashington Supreme Court· 1903-07-08· cited 22×
- Neal v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1924-07-14· cited 19×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1969-12-22· cited 18×
- State v. ZibellCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1982-06-07· cited 17×
- State v. MevisWashington Supreme Court· 1959-01-08· cited 16×
- State v. McGoldrickSupreme Court of Missouri· 1951-02-12· cited 16×
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court· 1907-03-19· cited 9×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.