State v. Stone
Citations
- 66 Wash. 625
- 120 P. 76
- 1912 Wash. LEXIS 819
Syllabus
<p>Indictment and Information — Verification—Waiver of Objection. The objection that an information was not reverified after it was amended is waived where the defendant demurred to the amended information and was later arraigned and pleaded not guilty without raising the objection as to the verification until after verdict.</p> <p>Prostitution — Placing Female in House — Evidence—Corroboration- — Sufficiency. Upon a trial for placing a female in charge of another for the purposes of prostitution, the evidence-of the prosecutrix that defendant took her to his house and introduced her to his wife and that she stayed there several weeks as a prostitute, is sufficiently corroborated, as required by Rem. & Bal. Code, § 2443, where several witnesses testified that the house was a house of prostitution conducted by the defendant and his wife.</p> <p>Same — Previous Unchastity — Evidence—Materiality. Upon a prosecution for placing a female in charge of another for the purposes of prostitution, the previous unchastity of the prosecutrix is not material, except as affecting her credibility as a witness.</p> <p>Criminal Law — Appeal—Review—Waiver of Objection. Where the accused withdrew objections to testimony expecting the answers to be favorable, he cannot predicate error thereon.</p> <p>Criminal Law — Appeal—Review—Harmless Error. Error in excluding a question as to whether the defendant prevented a female from leaving a house of prostitution is cured by permitting her to answer whether any one had done so.</p> <p>Prostitution — Placing Female in House — Elements of Offense. Physical restraint is not an essential element of the crime of placing a female in a house of prostitution.</p> <p>Prostitution — Placing Female in House — Evidence — Competency. Upon a prosecution for placing a female in charge of another for the purpose of prostitution, evidence tending to show the character of the house as a house of prostitution is competent.</p> <p>Witnesses — Impeachment—Convicti
Judges: Ellis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. SchumanWashington Supreme Court· 1915-12-23· cited 53×
- State v. OswaltWashington Supreme Court· 1963-05-09· cited 48×
- State v. PutzellWashington Supreme Court· 1952-03-20· cited 36×
- State v. TurnerWashington Supreme Court· 1921-03-29· cited 30×
- State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court· 1922-04-21· cited 24×
- State v. NolonWashington Supreme Court· 1924-04-15· cited 16×
- State v. OverlandWashington Supreme Court· 1912-05-29· cited 12×
- State v. ColumbusWashington Supreme Court· 1913-07-10· cited 12×
- Singer v. Metz Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1918-04-05· cited 9×
- Gardner v. SpaltWashington Supreme Court· 1915-06-23· cited 9×
- State v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court· 1922-10-06· cited 8×
- State v. JofferyWashington Supreme Court· 1924-04-22· cited 7×
- Marshall v. DunnWashington Supreme Court· 1916-10-09· cited 6×
- State v. HoodWashington Supreme Court· 1918-09-16· cited 3×
- State v. JacksonArizona Supreme Court· 1956-02-07· cited 3×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Staser v. HoganIndiana Supreme Court· 1889-06-08· cited 89×
- State v. WorkmanWashington Supreme Court· 1911-12-19· cited 56×
- Williams v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1896-03-15· cited 50×
- State v. PayneWashington Supreme Court· 1893-06-30· cited 39×
- State v. BlaineWashington Supreme Court· 1911-07-13· cited 27×
- State v. CarpenterWashington Supreme Court· 1903-07-15· cited 23×
- Welch v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1885-12-15· cited 22×
- State v. IlomakiWashington Supreme Court· 1905-12-08· cited 14×
- State v. McLainWashington Supreme Court· 1906-07-27· cited 13×
- Kirk v. Seattle Electric Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1910-05-05· cited 12×
- Wharton v. Tacoma Fir Door Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1910-04-01· cited 8×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.