State v. Patterson
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 1568
Syllabus
Manifest weight of the evidence jury instructions complicity firearm specifications abuse of discretion Reagan Tokes. Appellant's conviction was not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the victim witness's testimony contained inconsistencies. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in responding affirmatively to a jury question regarding the relevant law on the aggravated robbery charge in the context of complicity. Appellant's indefinite sentence pursuant to the Reagan Tokes Law does not violate his constitutional rights.
Judges: Kilbane
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- Blakemore v. BlakemoreOhio Supreme Court· 1983-07-06· cited 14,330×
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court· 1967-05-31· cited 7,146×
- State v. CarterOhio Supreme Court· 1995-07-26· cited 1,439×
- State v. AwanOhio Supreme Court· 1986-02-19· cited 1,385×
- State v. ThomasOhio Supreme Court· 1982-05-19· cited 667×
- Johnson v. Abdullah (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2021-09-22· cited 666×
- State v. DelvallieOhio Court of Appeals· 2022-02-17· cited 274×
- State v. HillOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-06· cited 33×
- State v. MatthewsOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-11-08· cited 27×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.