Court of Appeals of Kansas· 6/26/1998
State v. Patterson
Citations
- 963 P.2d 436
- 25 Kan. App. 2d 245
- 1998 Kan. App. LEXIS 70
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding the actor’s purpose of achieving eventual gratification was sufficient to establish act was sexually violent under Kansas Sex Offender Registration Act
- finding that conviction of burglary and theft in connection with stealing woman’s underwear was sexually motivated where defendant kept the underwear in a locked cabinet containing pornographic material
- finding that conviction of burglary and theft in connection with stealing woman's underwear was sexually motivated where defendant kept the underwear in a locked cabinet containing pornographic material
- theft of women’s underwear was sexually motivated because defendant “kept undeiwear in a locked cabinet containing pornographic materials”
- interpreting sex offender registration statute’s “sexual gratification” language more broadly
- burglary and theft of woman’s underwear sexually motivated
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lewis, Pierron, Burr
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
39 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-11-06· cited 152×
- State v. MaassSupreme Court of Kansas· 2003-03-07· cited 115×
- State v. ComanSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-03-30· cited 104×
- In RE the Detention of Paul Michael Blaise Paul Michael BlaiseSupreme Court of Iowa· 2013-05-03· cited 35×
- State v. ChambersCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2006-07-21· cited 35×
- In the Interest of C.C.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-07-27· cited 24×
- State v. WhalenWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2003-11-21· cited 15×
- State v. DonhamCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-05-11· cited 14×
- City of Liberal v. VargasCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-04-13· cited 12×
- State v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-12-22· cited 11×
- State v. HALL, JR.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-04-07· cited 10×
- State v. GunnCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-06-22· cited 10×
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-10-13· cited 9×
- State v. DreierCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-11-21· cited 9×
- State v. LimonCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2004-01-30· cited 8×
- State v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1998-12-31· cited 7×
- In Re the Marriage of AbplanalpCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2000-07-28· cited 7×
- Linenberger v. Kansas Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-04-06· cited 7×
- State v. ComanCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2009-08-28· cited 7×
- State v. CopeCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 2001-07-27· cited 7×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. MyersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-08-23· cited 141×
- State v. GonzalesSupreme Court of Kansas· 1994-04-22· cited 97×
- Tucker v. Hugoton Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1993-07-09· cited 95×
- Harris v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Kansas· 1963-12-05· cited 92×
- State v. AldersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-07-12· cited 65×
- In re the Appeal of Boeing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1997-01-24· cited 64×
- State v. LeSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-10-25· cited 50×
- In re ZivanovicSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-12-20· cited 35×
- Kenyon v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1993-12-10· cited 27×
- State v. REED, SR.Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1997-03-14· cited 15×
- Doolin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1997-11-07· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.