Doolin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that bullet wound which required hip bone and hip socket to be replaced constituted great bodily harm as matter of law
• holding that bullet wound which required a hip bone and hip socket to be replaced constituted great bodily harm as a matter of law
• holding that bullet wound which required a hip bone and hip socket to be replaced constituted great bodily harm as a matter of law
• holding that bullet wound which required hip bone and hip socket to be replaced constituted great bodily harm as matter of law
• both holding whether great bodily harm has occurred for purposes of aggravated battery is a question of fact

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).