Ohio Court of Appeals· 7/29/2024
State v. Bingham
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2861
Syllabus
Post-conviction Motion to Withdraw No-contest Plea Crim.R. 16 Brady Violation. Defendant-appellant did not establish manifest injustice, as required under Crim.R. 32.1 to withdraw his plea of no-contest after sentencing. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in deciding not to hold a hearing on the post-sentence motion to withdraw a plea.
Judges: Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
2 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- United States v. BagleySupreme Court· 1985-07-02· cited 8,539×
- United States v. AgursSupreme Court· 1976-06-24· cited 6,537×
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court· 1995-04-19· cited 6,003×
- Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court· 1999-06-17· cited 4,383×
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court· 1980-05-07· cited 3,804×
- State v. BushOhio Supreme Court· 2002-08-28· cited 236×
- State v. KeeneOhio Supreme Court· 1998-05-13· cited 231×
- State v. Bethel (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2022-03-22· cited 161×
- State v. WidmerOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-01-14· cited 54×
- State v. BinghamOhio Court of Appeals· 2019-08-19· cited 12×
- State v. JamesOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-03-02· cited 8×
- State v. CartlidgeOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-10-25· cited 8×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-02-21· cited 5×
- State v. JonesOhio Court of Appeals· 2013-03-07· cited 3×
- State v. ValeOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-11-21· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.