State v. Parrish

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• two offenses arise out of the same criminal episode if the charges are so factually interrelated that a complete account of one charge cannot be related without relating details of the other
• two offenses arise out of the same criminal episode if the charges are so factually interrelated that a complete account of one charge cannot be related without relating details of the other
• two offenses arise out of the same criminal episode if the charges are so factually interrelated that a complete account of one charge cannot be related without relating details of the other
• two offenses arise out of the same criminal episode if the charges are so factually interrelated that a complete account of one charge cannot be related without relating details of the other

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Mitter
  West Virginia Supreme Court· 1981-12-15· cited 41×
• People v. Rogers
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1987-09-14· cited 21×
• State v. Akau
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2008-05-30· cited 18×
• State v. Linthwaite
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-05-26· cited 15×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Boyd
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-04-01· cited 124×
• State v. Fitzgerald
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1973-12-13· cited 84×
• State v. Zimmerlee
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1972-01-19· cited 58×
• State v. Bishop
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1974-01-28· cited 36×
• State v. McKendall
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1978-09-18· cited 14×