Skip to main content

State v. Parker

Citations

  • 285 Or. App. 777
  • 398 P.3d 437
  • 2017 Ore. App. LEXIS 706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that it was error for the trial court to admit evidence of the name of the defendant’s crime of conviction because that evidence “was devoid of any probative value and was unfairly prejudicial”
  • reversing the trial court's admission of evidence that was devoid of probative value and was unfairly prejudicial to defendant, and remanding for a new trial, notwithstanding the lack of a record regarding the trial court's OEC 403 balancing rationale

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Anddehoog, Sercombe, Tookey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.