State v. McColly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that mere reference to non-VA documents is insufficient to incorporate them into a record
• holding that disputed document could not reasonably be expected to be part of record before Secretary and Board because “the connection to the appellant’s case [was] too tenuous”
• arguing that NIOSH report relied upon by DNA should reasonably be expected to be “a part of the administrative record in each such case involving a DNA dose estimate based on presence at Hiroshima or Nagasaki”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).