Skip to main content

State v. Parker

Citations

  • 197 Conn. 595
  • 500 A.2d 551
  • 1985 Conn. LEXIS 936

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dictum indicating that identification made ten months after commission of crime would not necessarily render identification unreliable
  • ten month period between identification and victim’s viewing of assailant did not render identification unreliable
  • ten month period between crime and identification not so long as to render identification unreliable
  • ten month period between identification and victim’s viewing of her assailant not so long as to render identification unreliable
  • dictum indicating that an identification made ten months after the commission of the crime was reliable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Santaniello

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

46 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.