Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2/22/2007
State v. Palubicki
Citations
- 727 N.W.2d 662
- 2007 Minn. LEXIS 80
- 2007 WL 528793
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a challenge simply stating that certain expenses were “not allowable” “was sufficiently detailed for purposes of the statute”
- declining to adopt a but-for test for restitution but requiring that losses be a direct result of the crime, which includes the expenses of decedent’s children to attend the murder trial
- inquiring whether the victims' losses were the \direct result\ of the offense
- “We have recognized that the restitution statute’s broad language gives the district court significant discretion to award restitution for a victim’s expenses.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Meyer
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State of Minnesota v. Brandon Wayne RiggsSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2015-07-01· cited 77×
- State v. YerkeyOhio Supreme Court· 2022-12-05· cited 42×
- Harry Jerome Evans v. State of MinnesotaSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-06-08· cited 24×
- State v. BrownbackMontana Supreme Court· 2010-05-04· cited 19×
- State of Minnesota v. Toby Earl JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2014-07-30· cited 13×
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2011-03-22· cited 12×
- State v. ArendsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2010-08-10· cited 9×
- State v. BoettcherSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2019-07-17· cited 9×
- In Re the Welfare of E.S.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 2007-05-08· cited 2×
- State of Minnesota v. Javier RodriguezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2015-05-11
- State of Minnesota v. Emile ReyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 2017-01-09
- State of Minnesota v. Henry Albert Allison, Jr.Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2024-01-10
- State of Minnesota v. Dontae Deshaun WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2024-11-13
- State of Minnesota v. Almanzo Ousley CottonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2024-11-13
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Paul Scott Seeman, AppellantSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2025-09-24
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2004-03-11· cited 94×
- State v. PflepsenSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-04-01· cited 73×
- State v. FaderSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-11-02· cited 57×
- State v. TenerelliSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1999-08-05· cited 49×
- State v. PalubickiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 2005-07-28· cited 42×
- State v. MaidiSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1995-09-15· cited 25×
- State v. TerpstraSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1996-04-12· cited 22×
- State v. LatimerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1999-12-28· cited 14×
- In Re the Welfare of D.D.G.Court of Appeals of Minnesota· 1995-06-06· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.