Skip to main content

State v. Latimer

Citations

  • 604 N.W.2d 103
  • 1999 Minn. App. LEXIS 1387
  • 1999 WL 1256410

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant who pleaded guilty to being an accomplice after the fact to murder could be required to pay restitution only for losses directly caused by her actions as an accessory and not for losses resulting from the murder
  • holding restitution for losses directly attributable to victim’s murder improper against defendant who helped conceal murder afterwards but otherwise took no part in it
  • restitution award against accessory-after-the-fact to murder only appropriate for “any losses [the victim’s] parents experienced as a result of Latimer’s actions to cover up the murder.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Halbrooks, Lansing, Shumaker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.