Court of Appeals of Oregon· 4/13/2016

State v. Padilla

Citations

277 Or. App. 440
371 P.3d 1242
2016 WL 1452443
2016 Ore. App. LEXIS 430

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that, on the partic- ular facts, the defendant having no prior convictions did “not lead to a conclusion that his sentence would shock the moral senses of reasonable people”
treating the defendant’s use of physical force to compel the victim’s hand to make sexual contact with his penis as a relevant factor
describ- ing that conduct as “on the serious end” of the spectrum of 106 State v. Lara-Vasquez first-degree sexual abuse
the defendant was “a long-time family friend whom [the victim] had known since she was a very young child”
where the defendant “committed a grave and invasive act of sexual abuse against an 11-year-old child[,]” his lack of criminal history did not make the sentence disproportionate
where the defendant “committed a grave and invasive act of sexual abuse against an 11-year-old child[,]” his lack of criminal history did not make the sentence disproportionate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dehoog, Muniz, Sercombe

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.