State v. Cockrell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming conviction of first-degree sexual abuse where defendant picked up his 11-year-old niece while roughhous- ing and repeatedly “rubbed” her crotch area
• affirming conviction of first-degree sexual abuse where defendant picked up his 11-year-old niece while roughhous- ing and repeatedly “rubbed” her crotch area
• “surrounding physical circumstances” of prior and currently charged acts were similar, including the absence of alcohol, drugs, violence, or coercion; the “types of touching”; and the defendant’s responses when confronted about his conduct
• \surrounding physical circumstances\ of prior and currently charged acts were similar, including the absence of alcohol, drugs, violence, or coercion; the \types of touching\; and the defendant's responses when confronted about his conduct
• defendant repeatedly rubbed the crotch of his 11-year-old niece

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Rodriguez/Buck
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2009-09-24· cited 151×
• State v. Deloretto
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2008-07-23· cited 15×
• State v. Bunting
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-09-10· cited 8×
• State v. Padilla
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-04-13· cited 5×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Johns
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1986-08-26· cited 242×
• State v. Pratt
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1990-01-11· cited 78×
• State v. Woodley
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-08-30· cited 48×
• State v. Sheets
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-05-12· cited 6×