Skip to main content

State v. Pabst

Citations

  • 44 P.3d 1230
  • 273 Kan. 658
  • 2002 Kan. LEXIS 167

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • focusing analysis on whether instruction given fairly and accurately stated the law as applied to the facts of the case where requested instruction denied
  • No error for prosecutor to say premeditation “means to have thought the matter over beforehand. It’s the conscious act of a person.”
  • No error for prosecutor to say premeditation \means to have thought the matter over beforehand. It's the conscious act of a person.\
  • no error for prosecutor to say premeditation \means to have thought the matter over beforehand. It's the conscious act of a person\
  • where 33 district court denies requested instruction, appellate court focuses inquiry on whether instruction given properly and fairly stated the law as applied to the facts of the case
  • prosecutor should avoid temptation to use synonym of “an instant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Six, Allegrucci, Lockett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.